Supreme Court Decision is a Victory for Consumers

Scott Kappes
Contributor
(866) 735-1102 Ext 346
Posted by Scott KappesMarch 04, 2009 4:01 PM

 

This morning the United States Supreme Court ruled against the drug maker Wyeth in a decision that can be seen as a huge victory for the American public. The a surprising decision the Court ruled that pharmaceutical companies can be held liable for harm caused to individuals who take their medications, despite previous federal approval.

The justices reaffirmed a Vermont Supreme Court hearing that upheld a $7 million award to guitarist Diana Levine, who had to have part of her arm amputated after being improperly injected with the Wyeth’s anti-nausea medication Phenergan as part of a treatment for a migraine.

"The question we must decide is whether the FDA's approvals provide Wyeth with a complete defense to Levine's tort claims. We conclude that they do not," Justice John Paul Stevens concluded in the court's majority opinion.

Levine’s attorneys argued that Wyeth should have provided stronger warning for administering the drug in the method that cost Ms. Levine her arm, while Wyeth attorneys contended that the Food and Drug Administration’s approval of the medication should prevent or pre-empt any subsequent liability claims against the company.

Federal pre-emption has long been the goal of Big Pharma and in recent years has been supported by the republicans of the Bush administration.

Following last year’s Supreme Court decision that pre-empted state liability claims regarding medical devices that had been approved by the FDA, most experts believed that the Court would deliver a similar decision in the Levine case.

Justice Clarence Thomas concurred in the majority's judgment that federal law does not prevent the state lawsuit but used a different legal approach. Dissenting were Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia and Samuel Alito.

Today’s judgment can be seen as a monumental victory for consumer rights and hopefully will be the first or steps toward correcting the recent erosion the rights of citizens in favor of big business.

1 Comment

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Sarah
Posted by Sarah
March 04, 2009 5:16 PM

This decision is an important victory for advocates of the right-to-know. As the National Coalition Against Censorship Executive Director Joan Bertin writes: "When the government can’t, or doesn’t collect, vital health and safety information, there are a few other ways to obtain it. Private litigation is one. Thanks to the Supreme Court, this kind of self-help is still an option."

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard Houston

InjuryBoard Houston RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Injury Board Houston is brought to you by Reich & Binstock

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Reich & Binstock 866-735-1102 Ext. 345 www.reichandbinstock.com
google
Personal Injury Lawyers Serving: Houston, Alvin, Angleton, Baytown, Beaumont, Brazoria County, Channel View, Clear Lake, Deer Park, Freeport, Galveston, Humble, Lake Jackson, League City, Pasadena, Pearland, Port Arthur, Texas City
4265 San FelipeSuite 1000, Houston, Texas 77027 [ Show Map ]
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address